Companies
With Highest Levels Of Employee Injury and Illness
|
Some Prominent Names From the List 1-800-FLOWERS Airborne Express American Airlines Coca-Cola Caterpillar Chiquita Continental Airlines Coors Dillards Domino's Pizza El Al FedEx Ford Frito-Lay GE Goodyear HarperCollins HCA Honda K Mart Kraft Kroger La-Z Boy Levi Strauss Lowes McGraw-Hill Michelin Mitsubishi Nabisco Nestle New York Times Nissan Northrop Grumman Northwest Airlines Oneida Pepsi-Cola Philips Pier 1 Pillsbury Publix Purina Mills Sara Lee Sealy Sears Sherwin-Williams Southwest Airlines Target TRW TWA Tyco Tyson Foods United Airlines UPS US Postal Service Wal-Mart Note: Although the headquarters of some of the above-named companies are on the list, in other cases only specific divisions, stores, plants, or other outlying locations are listed. |
|
>>> The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has quietly released its injury-illness hall of shame. The announcement on their website says:
Because of a FOIA lawsuit by the New York Times, a federal judge has ruled that OSHA must release the names and injury rates of all the companies. Apparently as a preemptive move, in February OSHA posted a list of the companies but not their injury rates. Not good enough, said the court. The agency has 60 days to appeal the FOIA ruling. While also getting the injury rates would be fantastic, the release of the companies' names is itself a coup that has been almost entirely overlooked. Below you'll find the list presented in several formats. |
|
OSHA List of 13,000 Workplaces With the Highest Occupational Injury and Illness Rates HTML {4.3 megs!} Micrsoft Excel {2.1 megs} comma-delimited text {940K} dBASE [zipped] {385K} A caveat about the list from the Associated Press: "The list only includes states covered by the federal OSHA, and not those 21 states that operate their own government-approved efforts." |
|
Related Associated Press Article Judge: OSHA Must Disclose Injury Rates Tue Aug 3, 5:59 PM ET WASHINGTON - The government must disclose the names of companies with the worst safety records along with their injury rates, a federal judge has ruled.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a Labor Department agency, had denied a Freedom of Information Act request filed in 2002 by The New York Times. The newspaper was seeking a list of the 13,000 companies that OSHA had identified as having injury and illness rates greater than the national average as well as their scores, essentially providing a ranking of the most hazardous work places in America. Last week's ruling in U.S. District Court for the Southern District in New York ordered OSHA to provide the information for the year 2002. "We're reviewing the decision and our options to determine what approach best advances the department's mission of protecting workers," Labor Department spokesman Ed Frank said Tuesday. OSHA, represented by the Justice Department, has 60 days to decide whether to appeal. The agency had argued the data was confidential because competitors would be able to determine, based on the injury rates, how many hours employees worked at certain companies. Hours worked and number of incidents causing lost workdays are used to calculate the rate. OSHA sent letters to the 13,000 employers notifying them that their rates were significantly elevated and encouraging them to reduce injuries. The government contended those companies and their addresses were available on OSHA's Web site, and the newspaper could contact them to ask for their injury rates. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin rejected that argument. "The court's clerks expended considerable time searching OSHA's Web site for these names and addresses, but were unable to locate them," Scheindlin wrote in the ruling. "This is likely because OSHA's Web site is extraordinarily difficult to navigate." OSHA, in a February news release, said the 13,000 work sites are listed alphabetically by state at http://www.osha.gov/as/opa/foia/hot_10.html. The list only includes states covered by the federal OSHA, and not those 21 states that operate their own government-approved efforts. The Labor Department, in denying The Times' request for injury rates, said it would have to get permission from all 13,000 employers before releasing the data. That would be too burdensome because it would require 30,290 staff hours, or about 15 years to respond, it said. The ruling harshly criticized the Labor Department, at times calling its arguments misplaced, illogical, puzzling and especially troubling. But the government said the newspaper did not "exhaust its administrative remedies" in negotiating with the department for the information before filing suit. The judge disagreed and noted that the department's response to an appeal by the Times was seven months late. The Times won a Pulitzer Prize this year for two three-part series by David Barstow and Lowell Bergman that investigated workplace deaths and the "culture of bureaucratic reluctance" at OSHA. |
|
front
page |
newest additions | index
+ search |
| posted
24 Aug 2004 site and original text copyright 2002-4 Russ Kick |